About the Results

Download the Working Paper

What did we find when we compared the treatment and control groups? We found that body-worn cameras had no statistically significant average effects on any of the measured outcomes.

What does this mean?

First, let’s take a look at the results of our analyses.

The charts below plots the estimated average treatment effect of BWCs (as a yearly rate, per 1,000 officers) on the following outcomes: documented use of force, civilian complaints, officer discretion (as measured by arrests for disorderly conduct), whether a case was prosecuted, and case disposition. We calculate these estimates by comparing the average rate of the outcome (e.g., use of force) in the treatment group with the average rate of the outcome in the control group. (All estimates are reported in the Supplementary Materials.)

If BWCs have no impact, then the outcomes between the two groups of officers will be about the same. If, on the other hand, we see statistically significant differences between the two groups, then we can infer that the BWCs caused that difference.

What makes a difference “significant” is a statistical question. Some differences are due to chance, just noise caused by something other than the program we implemented—in this case, BWCs. The randomized design and associated statistics give us a rigorous way to estimate the average effect and to describe how uncertain we are about it.

For each outcome, we report our best estimate of the effects of BWCs as well as the margin of error (or 95% confidence interval), shown by the bars extending away from the estimate. This interval expresses our uncertainty (how much noise is there?). Roughly speaking, when a confidence interval spans negative, zero, and positive values, scientists sometimes speak of the result being “statistically insignificant,” or “null.” More plainly, we interpret this to mean that BWCs had no detectable effect on the outcome in question.

Select a chart below to explore the estimated average effects of BWCs on the measured outcomes, as well as the uncertainty of those estimates.

BWCs decreased outcome
BWCs increased outcome
Average Treatment Effect (per 1000 officers per year)
Select a Chart
Police Behavior
Judicial Outcomes
Arrests for Disorderly Conduct
Use of Force
Complaints
Prosecuted
Found Guilty
Found Not Guilty
Entered Plea
Not Pursued

Police Behavior

Use of Force

A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is estimated to document 74 more uses of force in a year than officers without BWCs. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 97 documented uses of force to an increase of 244 documented uses of force per 1,000 officers, per year.

Conclusion: The presence of BWCs had no detectable effect on police use of force.

Police Behavior

Civilian Complaints

A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is estimated to receive 57 more civilian complaints in a year than officers without BWCs. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 24 complaints to an increase of 138 complaints per 1,000 officers, per year.

Conclusion: The presence of BWCs had no detectable effect on civilian complaints filed against police.

Police Behavior

Arrests for Disorderly Conduct

A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is estimated to make 127 fewer arrests for disorderly conduct in a year than officers without BWCs. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 671 arrests for disorderly conduct to an increase of 416 such arrests per 1,000 officers, per year.

Conclusion: The presence of BWCs had no detectable effect on police discretion, as measured by arrests for disorderly conduct.

Judicial Outcomes

Prosecuted

We examine whether the presence of a BWC on the arresting officer has an effect on the rate of prosecutions. A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is associated with 2,422 more prosecutions in a year than officers without BWCs. That’s our best estimate based on the data we collected. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 2,738 prosecutions to an increase of 7,582 prosecutions per 1,000 officers, per year.

Conclusion: The effect here may be meaningful—potentially change in the thousands—but there is a lot of uncertainty in the estimate. We cautiously note no detectable effect, while also reminding ourselves that access to judicial outcomes data was constrained (see About the Approach).

Judicial Outcomes

Found Guilty

We examine whether the presence of a BWC on the arresting officer has an effect on case disposition. A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is associated with 14 more cases with a disposition of “found guilty” in a year than officers without BWCs. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 26 cases with a disposition of “found guilty” to an increase of 53 cases with a disposition of “found guilty.”

Conclusion: The presence of BWCs on the arresting officer had no detectable effect on the disposition of those cases as &lquo;found guilty.”

Judicial Outcomes

Found Not Guilty

We examine whether the presence of a BWC on the arresting officer has an effect on case disposition. A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is associated with 16 fewer cases with a disposition of &lquo;found not guilty” in a year than officers without BWCs. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 59 cases with a disposition of “found not guilty” to an increase of 28 cases with such a disposition.

Conclusion: The presence of BWCs on the arresting officer had no detectable effect on the disposition of those cases as “found not guilty.”

Judicial Outcomes

Entered Plea

We examine whether the presence of a BWC on the arresting officer has an effect on case disposition. A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is associated with 63 more cases that were disposed with a plea entered in a year than officers without BWCs. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 629 cases disposed with plea entered to an increase of 755 cases with a such a disposition.

Conclusion: The presence of BWCs on the arresting officer had no detectable effect on the disposition of those cases with a plea entered.

Judicial Outcomes

Not Pursued

We examine whether the presence of a BWC on the arresting officer has an effect on case disposition. A group of 1,000 officers with BWCs is associated with 114 fewer cases that were ultimately not pursued in a year than officers without BWCs. However, the data are also consistent with real effect of BWCs being anywhere from a decrease of 315 cases not pursued to an increase of 86 cases with a such a disposition.

Conclusion: The presence of BWCs on the arresting officer had no discernible effect on the disposition of cases as “not pursued.”